CEOs and boards increasingly want CFOs to not only deliver a finance organization that gets the numbers right, but also partner with them in shaping the company’s strategy.
But when asked what they want from a strategist CFO, their answers vary widely.
The challenge for CFOs is to choose effective ways to engage in the strategy process in the context of their company’s business, leadership, and directors
For example, CEOs typically want their CFOs to look around corners for new opportunities and potential black swans, as well as help transform the company’s products and markets, capitalize and plan for future growth, create and effectively communicate the corporate growth story, and improve decision making around key investments.
At the same time, however, boards have their own expectations concerning risk management, protecting the company’s reputation, and compliance and regulatory matters, among others.
Given this varied mix of responses, where should CFOs focus, and how should they orient themselves to supporting strategy?
Based on practice observations, discussions with numerous CFOs, and knowledge gained from more than 500 Deloitte CFO Transition Lab™ sessions, we have framed the four orientations of a strategist CFO model to help guide better alignment between CFOs’ actions and CEO and board expectations.
These four orientations bring greater clarity to the strategist role and the capacity of an organization to reorient and execute a new strategy. In this article, we outline the orientations and examine how each is a choice regarding the scope of a CFO’s role and means of involvement in the strategy process.
The strategy process
Making the necessary choice starts with a version of the cascade of strategic choices first laid out by A.J. Lafley and Richard Martin in their book, Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works.
Key corporate strategy questions include:
- What are the aspirations and goals of the company?
- Where will you play? What products and/or services will your company choose to offer, and in what markets will you offer these products and services?
- How will you play to win? How will your company differentiate itself to gain advantage over competitors?
- What distinctive capabilities are required to sustain competitive advantage?
- What management systems and processes are required to succeed?
CFOs can then bring a financial discipline to support and extend the above strategy process by addressing questions such as:
- Are the financial goals of the company viable?
- What products and markets deliver the greatest promise for revenue or margin growth?
- How should the company organize and structure financing of key investments to generate competitive advantage?
- What structures (for example, business models; legal and tax entities; onshore, offshore, or outsourcing talent models) and processes (automation, build vs. buy, networking, and so on) enable competitive advantage and deliver superior market valuation and returns?
- What financial and management reporting enables management to effectively execute and deliver the strategy?
The strategy process frames answers to the above questions and executes on them to deliver returns to shareholders.
The challenge for CFOs is to choose effective ways to engage in the process in the context of their company’s business, leadership, and directors. The four key orientations below outline how CFOs can choose to engage the strategy process.
There are four distinct ways CFOs can orient themselves: as responder, challenger, architect, or transformer.
Responder. As a responder, the CFO and the finance organization support the company’s strategy development by helping key business leaders quantitatively analyze the financial implications of different strategy choices.
This type of CFO orientation is especially evident in highly decentralized businesses, where the CEO chooses to drive accountability for strategy and performance to business-unit leaders. Occasionally, this orientation is also prevalent when the CEO chooses to limit the role of the CFO or finance in the strategy process to quantitative and analytic support.
To be an effective responder, the CFO and finance organization should consider having a central financial planning and analysis (FP&A) capability that delivers the relevant analyses and data to the businesses, whose leaders have primary responsibility for generating strategy alternatives.
Challenger. As a challenger, the CFO and finance organization act as stewards of future value in the strategy process by critically examining the risks to, and expected returns on, different strategy alternatives.
Being a challenger is sometimes equated with being a “Dr. No,” as the CFO and finance organization seek to minimize risk or ensure adequate returns to future capital allocations and investments.
Being an effective challenger may require the CFO and finance organization to have FP&A capabilities similar to those required of a responder, as well as access to requisite information from the business units on key strategy assumptions and models.
Importantly, the CFO requires the permission of the CEO to challenge business-unit leaders and their strategies. When given that permission, the CFO as challenger is especially critical to the review of major strategy investment decisions.
Architect. In the architect orientation, the CFO, finance department, and business leaders jointly work through shaping strategy choices and apply finance strategies to complement and maximize the value of particular strategies.
Architects go beyond the challenger orientation to enable the financing of innovative initiatives through varied finance strategies and finance arrangements with suppliers, customers, or delivery channels. Architects thus work to find “a path to yes” on key business investments.
To effectively deliver the architect orientation, the CFO, finance organization, and businesses might need to establish mutual trust and work together at the outset of setting the strategy.
In addition, the CFO often needs a strong finance team inside the businesses to proactively partner with business leaders throughout the strategy process.
Transformer. As a transformer, the CFO becomes a lead partner to the CEO in shaping and executing future strategy. The CFO is key to execution of “real operational and financial options” for shifting the product market mix, delivering value, and creating distinctive capabilities.
For example, consider a multi-division company with common accounting and financial systems, where the original synergies driving the existing product market mix no longer exist.
By upgrading the systems, but doing so in a way that allows the efficient spinout of a division in the future, the CFO operationally creates the capacity for shifting a core strategy choice – the product market mix.
Or by changing the mix of debt to equity, the CFO may free up cash to invest in future growth, creating financial options for the future. Through carefully structured financing and lease models, the company could change how customers are able to buy or use its products, thus shifting the business model to more-profitable formats.
In short, CFOs as transformers proactively engage in addressing the core questions in a strategy process, and they develop and execute options through finance in a way that allows the company to shift its strategy effectively.
Choosing to be an effective strategist
For CFOs, choosing to be an effective strategist demands:
- earning a seat at the strategy table
- having an effective finance team
- selecting the strategy orientation that is appropriate to the context of the company and level of permission granted by the CEO
This is obviously not simple. Effective Strategist CFOs continually need to reorient themselves to changing organizational situations and contexts.
While increasingly recruited to be strategy partners to their CEOs, many CFOs in our CFO Transition Lab™ sessions note they have to earn a seat at the strategy table – especially those internally promoted from controller, accounting, and finance-operations roles.
Initially, this generally requires three things: knowing the businesses, generating valuable strategy ideas and opportunities, and having a finance organization that delivers the basic finance and accounting processes consistently without errors.
One way to generate valuable strategy opportunities is to ask critical questions about the dominant growth constraints, uncertainties, and risks, and scale assumptions confronting the company.
A strong finance team is also key to earning a seat at the table, for three reasons. First, by getting the basics right, the team presents the finance organization as credible. Second, a strong finance team frees up the CFO to attend to strategic matters. Third, it can provide the quantitative analysis and support capabilities vital to shaping strategy.
The choice of strategist orientation depends extensively on the context of the company and the level of permission from the CEO. The table below summarizes common requirements for CEO permission and finance and organization capabilities, as well as typical contexts for the different types of orientations.
Common Requirements for the Strategist CFO
Click image to enlarge and download
No single approach
There is no one single approach to being an effective Strategist CFO.
The four CFO orientations described herein should help CFOs, CEOs, boards, and business-unit leaders better establish mutual expectations on how the CFO will engage in the strategy process and address key strategy questions within the company.
Moreover, these orientations are not static, and the appropriate orientation will vary with the changing context and performance of the organization.
About the Author
This Deloitte CFO Insights article was developed with the guidance of Dr. Ajit Kambil, Global Research Director, CFO Program, Deloitte LLP and Lori Calabro, Senior Manager, CFO Education & Events, Deloitte LLP. For more information about Deloitte’s CFO Program, visit www.deloitte.com/us/cfocenter.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Photo credit: Shutterstock