Emerging Markets Winners in 2011, But Worldwide Growth to Slow

Worldwide growth will slow down in 2011 at 3.4% compared to 4% in 2010, forecasts trade receivables management services provider Coface. The slowdown will be caused the combined effects of debt reduction in the private sector, the setting up of restrictive budget policies in Europe, the possible rise in raw materials and the expected slowing in worldwide trade.


The advanced countries will show growth of 1.8% compared to 2.3% in 2010 and the euro zone will experience limited growth deceleration (1.4% compared to 1.7% in 2010). This moderated drop will have a negative impact on the average credit risk for companies but the impact will be highly contained as the growth differential between 2010 and 2011 is limited to 0.6 point of GDP.


The big winners of the crisis are the emerging countries, which will continue the solid growth trajectory in 2011 with a slight slowdown: 6.2% compared to 6.7% in 2010. Contrary to the euro zone, where the private debt bubble has resulted in sovereign crises, activity in the emerging countries is not handicapped by the weight of private debt. However, the emerging countries are not immune to a surge in indebtedness in the private sector. Thus, Coface is monitoring two types of profiles amid the investment boom that is expected to continue in 2011:


  • The "Polish-Brazilian" profile: companies have a tendency to go into debt abroad as the local banks are too reticent and the domestic rates are prohibiting, leading to the risk of having in these countries counterparties with more and more debt in foreign currency;


  • The "Chinese-Vietnam" profile: companies increase their debt in local currency with domestic banks which are often not in a position to correctly analyse the risks. Entities with high debt and sometimes not very transparent could have difficulties.


Convergence of Risks


Based on its experience in evaluating country risks, Coface is observing a positive trend in terms of the number of changes in country ratings for the year 2010, discarding a "double dip" scenario. Although in 2009 Coface carried out 23 upgradings or putting under positive watch and 47 downgradings or putting under negative watch, in 2010 it reclassified or placed under positive watch  47 countries and downgraded or placed under negative watch only 6 countries.


The worldwide panorama of the country risk presented in the 2011 conference underlined a pronounced scissor effect for the risks between the advanced countries and the emerging countries linked to the stability of the performance of the latter and to the resistance of the payment experience observed by Coface with the companies from emerging economies during the crisis. The emerging countries have high and stable rates of activity and strong financial solidity while the risks are degraded for the advanced countries. Among the latter, only 9 out of 28 have returned to their pre-crisis level.


Before the crisis, the lowest rating in the advanced countries was A2; 9 emerging countries had ratings greater than or equal to A2. In 2010, the lowest rating in the advanced countries was A4. Twenty-seven emerging countries including China, Turkey, Brazil, India and Poland have ratings greater than or equal to A4 and now have a better ratings than Greece, Ireland and Portugal, subject to the debt bubbles whether private or public. Turkey is now only one notch below the United Kingdom and Poland has a better rating than Iceland.





Suggested Articles

Some of you might have already been aware of the news that Questex—with the aim to focus on event business—will shut down permanently all media brands in Asia…

Some advice for transitioning into an advisory role

Global risks are intensifying but the collective will to tackle them appears to be lacking. Check out this report for areas of concern