Business Execs Believe Compliance Can Cut Energy Costs

While around half of executives say energy efficiency initiatives have helped improve their organisation’s bottom line in the past three years, and four in five believe that energy efficiency will play a more important role in their business in the future, most are still grappling with how to implement enterprise-wide energy saving measures. This is among the findings of a new global research report, Unlocking the Benefits of Energy Efficiency: An Executive Dilemma, produced by the Economist Intelligence Unit and sponsored by Ingersoll Rand.

 

The research also suggests that C-suite and less senior executives don’t see eye to eye on the effectiveness of energy-saving efforts in their companies. Respondents beneath the C-suite are significantly more likely (61%) to say that their organisation does not do enough to integrate energy efficiency initiatives into business strategy (compared with 49% of C-level respondents). This disconnect is significant, as without senior-level support, energy-efficiency initiatives may not be adequately resourced. The data indicate that the C-suite may need to take another look at whether or not their company’s efforts are as successful as they perceive them to be.

 

The report highlights that large companies argue that legislation will create a level playing field, helping foster a market for energy-efficient systems. Half of surveyed executives see regulation as a benefit, compared with only 28% who deem it to be a burden. Only 27% of executives cite compliance with legislation as currently a prime spur to cutting energy consumption, with the vast majority (69%) citing cost savings as the chief motive. However, legislation is expected to play a bigger role in the future and become such a spur for many companies.

 

According to the report, companies seem to underestimate the value that their investors assign to energy efficiency. Only 16% of survey respondents felt energy efficiency was “very important” to their investors, and only 7% of survey respondents cite pressure from stakeholders such as investors as spurring energy efficiency initiatives. Yet in fact institutional investors and pension funds are pushing the firms they invest in to address their carbon footprint.

 

Only 26% of respondents say their organisation has conducted an energy audit; some 22% do no measurement at all. Although experts agree that the best efficiency strategies need to cut across functional lines, at present few companies outside the largest organisations have a chief energy officer co-ordinating such initiatives.

 

For many companies, particularly retailers and those who outsource their manufacturing, much of their total energy consumption occurs in their supply chain, notes the report. "Yet our survey shows that most firms tend to focus internally, with few looking outside their direct operations to their supply chain. Just 8% said energy efficiency was a priority for suppliers, and only 4% said they had worked with suppliers in this area," says the EIU.

 

 

MORE ARTICLES ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Suggested Articles

Some of you might have already been aware of the news that Questex—with the aim to focus on event business—will shut down permanently all media brands in Asia…

Some advice for transitioning into an advisory role

Global risks are intensifying but the collective will to tackle them appears to be lacking. Check out this report for areas of concern