Strategic Intelligence for CFOs, Finance Directors, Controllers and Treasurers in Asia  | 
2012, May 18

Cash Management: What Lehman Brothers Wrought

Cash Management: What Lehman Brothers Wrought

by Cesar Bacani, 30 August 2011

When the venerable Lehman Brothers imploded in 2008, the unthinkable event sent shock waves to corporate treasuries everywhere. Suddenly, the trend of companies moving towards using one single global banking provider for cash and treasury management was stopped in its tracks.

 
“Now the trend is very much around one provider per region,” says Victor Penna, Head of Regional Solutions & Advisory Team, Asia Pacific, at J.P.Morgan Treasury Services. “I would say, in 80-85% of cases, treasurers are awarding their business to different banks in each region.”
 
In Part 1 of an interview he did with CFO Innovation’s Cesar Bacani, Penna outlines the post-crisis cash and treasury landscape in Asia, the impact on cash visibility and the dynamics between global and regional treasury centres, and other issues. Excerpts:
 
What are the trends in Asia that you are seeing in terms of the way treasurers are buying transactional banking services?
At a global level, treasurers are looking to diversify their counterparty risk. The way that’s actually expressing itself in the market is that they are tending to bundle their banking by region.
 
In the past, the trend was moving towards one single global provider. Now the trend is very much around one provider per region. I would say, in 80-85% of cases, treasurers are awarding their business to different banks in each region.
 
So they’ll use one bank for Asia, a different bank for Europe, a different bank for North America, and another bank in the Middle East, depending on how many regions they deal with.
 
Because if Lehman Brothers can fail . . .
That’s right. There were some companies that were with one bank and they felt very exposed [during the global financial crisis].
 
A smaller number of treasurers are actually breaking it up further, saying, ‘I’ll have different payments and receivables banks, or I might even use multiple banks within one region.’ But that’s less common. The most common model is really one bank per region.
 
That raises the question of inter-operability and visibility of cash positions. Is SWIFT for corporates the answer?
I think SWIFT for corporates is playing a role in the market, but it is probably most strong among the European corporates. Some of them use many banks around the world and they use SWIFT for corporates as their single pipe. What SWIFT for corporates gives them is a very efficient way of transacting on accounts, and getting account data for many banks.
 
But the more predominant model is that corporate treasurers will use one bank per region, and they’ll have one host-to-host link in Asia, for example, another host-to-host link in North America, another one in Europe. Those host-to-host links would tend to be proprietary links with each bank.
 

So how do treasurers get a global view of all the company’s bank accounts if each region is serviced by a separate bank?

It’s more important that the regional treasury center has the view around that region. If you’re using one bank in the region, the regional treasurer can see everything happening in that region.
 
The way companies construct the global view is through the treasury management system. It doesn’t matter that they’re using three or four different host-to-host links because all those links are feeding data into the same global treasury management system. The treasury management system is what’s giving them a global view through the data that each host-to-host link is feeding into the treasury management system.
 

Related articles

Comment on this article

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <a> <p> <span> <div> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <img /> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <object> <strike> <caption>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Verification Code
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
CFO innovation Asia Accounting and Regulation the Asia Pacific resource center for senior finance executives, daily news, analysis, best practice and case studies in Accounting Regulation, IFRS, US GAAP, Tax, investor relations, corporate governance, Corporate Law, Financial Regulators, Internal Audit, Audit, Corporate Law.
CFO innovation Asia, Finance and Banking the Asia Pacific resource center for senior finance executives, daily news, analysis, best practice and case studies in Corporate Finance, trade finance, treasury and risk management, capital expenditure, Banking, mergers and acquisitions
CFO innovation Asia the Asia Pacific resource center for senior finance executives, daily news, analysis, best practice and case studies in Finance Management, Corporate Governance, Human Resource Management, Compensation and Benefits, Mergers and Acquisitions, Professional Development, Corporate Real Estate, Risk Management, Budgeting and Forecasting, Business Process Management, Business Process Reengineering, Outsourcing.
CFO innovation Asia Technology the Asia Pacific resource center for senior finance executives, daily news, analysis, best practice and case studies in Finance Systems, Business Intelligence, EPR, Accounting software, CRM, Cloud Computing, Telecommunications, Business Process Outsourcing, Business Process Management Software.